首页> 外文OA文献 >Social Perspectives And Symbolic Domination: Women's Political Presence, In Iris Marion Young And Pierre Bourdieu [perspectivas Sociais E Dominação Simbólica: A Presença Política Das Mulheres Entre Iris Marion Young E Pierre Bourdieu]
【2h】

Social Perspectives And Symbolic Domination: Women's Political Presence, In Iris Marion Young And Pierre Bourdieu [perspectivas Sociais E Dominação Simbólica: A Presença Política Das Mulheres Entre Iris Marion Young E Pierre Bourdieu]

机译:社会观点和象征统治:妇女的政治存在,在艾里斯·马里昂·扬(Iris Marion Young)和皮埃尔·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)中

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article looks at women's political participation and presence within political power. In this regard, we discuss the tension between the emancipatory potential offered by incorporation of multiple perspectives into political debate and the reproductive action of the field. Starting from a look at causes that, in our view, may be responsible for the relative absence of women in decision-making circles and for their alleged "lack of interest" in politics, we discuss perspectives that are, in one way or another, geared toward solving (improving) this situation. The article is organized into three sections. In the first, we defend the position that a more promising way to justify the need for women's presence is offered by understanding that spaces of deliberation should house a plurality of relevant social perspectives - a concept that can be most clearly associated with the work of the U.S. political theoretician, Iris Marion Young. In the second section, we discuss some of the problems contained within this concept, most particularly, a certain naiveté present in the ideal that derives from it: the creation of a pluralist discussion and decision-making spaces resulting from electoral quotas. We use the notion of "field", taken from Pierre Bourdieu's work, in order to cleanse Young's ideas of such naiveté. Within the third section, we introduce an additional element: Nancy Fraser's distinction between "affirmative" and "transforming" policies. As preliminary conclusions, we end with an evaluation of the limitations and potentials of a politics based on the defense of increased presence of "social perspectives".
机译:本文着眼于妇女在政治权力中的政治参与和存在。在这方面,我们讨论了将多种观点纳入政治辩论所提供的解放潜力与该领域的生殖行动之间的紧张关系。从我们认为可能是造成妇女在决策圈中相对缺乏以及她们在政治中所谓的“缺乏兴趣”的原因出发,我们讨论了一种或多种观点,致力于解决(改善)这种情况。本文分为三个部分。首先,我们捍卫这样的立场,即通过理解,讨论空间应容纳多种相关的社会观点,从而提供一种更有希望的方法来证明存在妇女的需要,这一概念可以与妇女的工作最明显地联系在一起。美国政治理论家Iris Marion Young。在第二部分中,我们讨论了此概念中包含的一些问题,尤其是从中衍生出的理想中存在的某些天真之处:选举配额产生的多元化讨论和决策空间。我们使用从皮埃尔·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)的作品中获得的“田野”(field)概念,以净化扬(Young)关于这种天真的想法。在第三部分中,我们引入了一个附加元素:南希·弗雷泽(Nancy Fraser)在“肯定”政策与“变革”政策之间的区别。作为初步结论,我们以对“社会视角”的存在增加的辩护为基础,对政治的局限性和潜力进行评估。

著录项

  • 作者

    Miguel L.F.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 por
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号